On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:15 AM, Eric Hodel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jun 4, 2008, at 00:33 AM, Stephen Bannasch wrote: > >> At 6:22 PM -0700 6/3/08, Jeremy Kemper wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Eric Hodel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> I believe RubyGems is currently feature-complete for the next release. >>>> For >>>> the next while I'll be focusing on bugfixes and patches from the >>>> tracker. I >>>> expect to release a new version in two weeks at minimum, possibly >>>> longer. >>> >>> I'd love to see little-known --format-executable enabled by default >>> for gem installs. >> >> I would like the opposite to be the default. > > I would love to make --format-executable the default, but that will cause > too much confusion and will inconvenience the majority too much. (Maybe I > shouldn't have made it default for setup.rb/gem update --system, but the two > new rubygems/defaults files may help improve that situation.)
The naming changes only when that person has changed his ruby's naming also, so it feels natural. The majority have a vanilla ruby so they'll see no change or confusion. > >> -- background on my setup -- > > [...] > >> I installed rubinius source into rubinius/code and installed it into >> rubinius/install. >> >> But since Rubinius doesn't have the equivalent of '-S' I need to supply >> the full path to the gem.rb command. > > `rbx gem env` will do what you want. > > We have discussed making gem executables accessible via rbx as a subcommand, > `rbx rake`. We will probably wire this in via the rubygems/defaults file. jeremy _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
