On Sep 30, 2008, at 21:29 PM, Jim Freeze wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Jim Weirich
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm still not sure what advantage this has over a simple convention
of
providing a base require file using the same name as the gem.
I'm not convinced yet either.
It has been said several times that it is not the responsibility of
rubygems to ensure that the gem name and the require name correspond
to each other or may be derived. But what if a notice/warning was
generated by rubygems during building of a gem if it did not find a
filename that is not the same as the gem name.
Can you file a feature request for this? It's easy to add, but I
don't have much time to work on RubyGems right now.
_______________________________________________
Rubygems-developers mailing list
Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
