On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Berger, Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf >> Of Eric Hodel >> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 7:38 PM >> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org >> Subject: [Rubygems-developers] Please test for a 1.3.1 >> >> I will be including the current trunk on Thursday in Ruby for the >> upcoming 1.9.1. Shortly afterward I will release RubyGems 1.3.1. >> There are only a few bug fixes: >> >> Silencing the PATH warning for unpack >> Fixes for Gem.inflate, deflate, etc. >> Switched to MiniTest for 1.9 compatibility Gem.dir reads > > Are you making minitest a requirement even for 1.8.x? That's how it > seems to be now: > > Ruby 1.8.6-p114 (VC++ 8) > Windows XP Pro >
Looks like, the same here. > C:\Documents and Settings\djberge\workspace\rubygems>rake test > (in C:/Documents and Settings/djberge/workspace/rubygems) > C:0:Warning: Gem::manage_gems is deprecated and will be removed on or > after March 2009. > Install minitest gem > ./lib/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `gem_original_require': no such > file to load -- minitest/unit > (LoadError) > from ./lib/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `require' > from C:/Documents and > Settings/djberge/workspace/rubygems/test/gemutilities.rb:14 > from ./lib/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in > `gem_original_require' > from ./lib/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `require' > from ./test/test_config.rb:7 > from > C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.3/lib/rake/rake_test_loader.rb:5 > :in `load' > from > C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.3/lib/rake/rake_test_loader.rb:5 > from > C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.3/lib/rake/rake_test_loader.rb:5 > :in `each' > from > C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.3/lib/rake/rake_test_loader.rb:5 > rake aborted! > Command failed with status (1): [C:/ruby/bin/ruby -w -Ilib > "C:/ruby/lib/rub...] > > The Warning line (and format) is strange, too. > The warning line is because Rake is using manage_gems in the script which is being "required" by the rubygems stubs... latest version (0.8.3 I think) have that fixed -- but memory is not my strong point today. > Regards, > > Dan > BTW: all tests passes on MinGW, and all test pases on mswin32 (VC6). One thing I noticed is that when you install the gem in ~/.gem or any other place outside the gems of the distribution, it fails. I'll provide more info later today. -- Luis Lavena AREA 17 - Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so. Douglas Adams _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
