On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Berger, Daniel <daniel.ber...@qwest.com> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: rubygems-developers-boun...@rubyforge.org >> [mailto:rubygems-developers-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf >> Of Luis Lavena >> Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 8:21 AM >> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org >> Subject: Re: [Rubygems-developers] Gem location and site arch >> directory > > <snip> > >> >> >> >> Thoughts? This iwll be the first drawback. >> > >> > I guess I don't see the problem in practice. The >> 'lib/x86-mingw32/my_ext.so' would not exist except and until >> it was installed as a gem. How people setup their tests is up >> to them and seems, to me, to be orthogonal to this issue. >> > >> >> Well, if I try to run the test of a installed gem that moved >> the extension to this directory then will be broken (gem test my-gem) > > Isn't the plan to modify $LOAD_PATH so that it doesn't break? >
Is gem test altering the $LOAD_PATH and adding libdir? Or is just executing the tests? Anyway, I'm just being extremist. We didn't heard back from Eric Hodel. Eric: what are your thoughts on this one? -- Luis Lavena AREA 17 - Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but rather when there is nothing more to take away. Antoine de Saint-Exupéry _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
