On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Eric Hodel <drbr...@segment7.net> wrote: > On Mar 12, 2009, at 08:23, Berger, Daniel wrote: > [...] > >>> >>> Yeah, the new =~ comparison implemented is not passing test >>> under MinGW: >>> >>> http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rubygems-developers/2009-Januar >>> y/004346.html >>> >>> Didn't had time to check those. >>> >>> I can provide MinGW binaries if you want. >> >> Ok, it also looks like we have some new test failures on Windows. This is >> Ruby 1.8.6-p114 on Windows XP Pro. >> >> C:\Documents and Settings\djberge\workspace\rubygems>rake test > > Can you run this piped through unit_diff -u? It's in the ZenTest gem.
revision 2085, after my last commit: MinGW results: http://pastie.org/416563 VC6 results: http://pastie.org/416566 -- Luis Lavena AREA 17 - Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but rather when there is nothing more to take away. Antoine de Saint-Exupéry _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
