On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Berger, Daniel <daniel.ber...@qwest.com> wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: rubygems-developers-boun...@rubyforge.org >> [mailto:rubygems-developers-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf >> Of Eric Hodel >> Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 9:23 PM >> To: RubyGems developers mailing list >> Subject: Re: [Rubygems-developers] Revision 2154 Results on >> Windows (mingw32and mswin32) >> >> >> On Apr 6, 2009, at 20:54, Luis Lavena wrote: >> >> > The Following are the pasties containing different versions of Ruby >> > 1.8.6 (from p114 to p368 silently released last week). >> > >> > mingw32: >> > http://pastie.org/439209 >> >> There have been some changes to optparse, I see the >> test_add_option_overlapping_common_and_local_options failure with: >> >> ruby 1.8.8dev (2009-04-06 revision 23143) [i386-darwin9.6.0] >> >> and see some diffs from apple ruby (1.8.6) too. > > Oh, for the love of... >
I said exactly the same. That's why I'm sticking to 1.8.6, but it seems they backported some weird stuff even to that. > So, now're we're going to start having to check the version of Ruby, even > within the 1.8.x branch? Or is there a more generic approach we can take? I really don't know, and basically we will end being a huge mess of code to workaround all those issues between versions. -- Luis Lavena AREA 17 - Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but rather when there is nothing more to take away. Antoine de Saint-Exupéry _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
