On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 3:15 AM,  <nore...@rubyforge.org> wrote:
> Summary: Feature: Make trailing zeroes in gem version significant
>
> Initial Comment:
> I'd like for 1.0.0 to be seen as > 1.0

I'm sorry, but this makes no sense to me and I suspect that it would
be significantly more confusing to users.

What's the use case for this? Why should (1.0.0 > 1.0) be true? To me,
1, 1.0, and 1.0.0 are all the same in a dotted versioning system.

-austin
-- 
Austin Ziegler * halosta...@gmail.com * http://www.halostatue.ca/
               * aus...@halostatue.ca * http://www.halostatue.ca/feed/
               * aus...@zieglers.ca
_______________________________________________
Rubygems-developers mailing list
http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems
Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers

Reply via email to