On Fri, 1 May 2009, Chad Woolley wrote:
> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Eric Hodel <drbr...@segment7.net> wrote: > > I've cleaned out most of the easy stuff in the bug and patch queue again, > > should we release a 1.3.3? > > http://www.extremeprogramming.org/rules/releaseoften.html :-) Pretty sure what that's about, but I have only one caution: How do we check for version numbers? If we assume /\d\.\d\.\d/ as Ruby has in the past we will run out. If we assume /\d+\.\d+\.\d+/ then roll on Rubygems 12.230.965 and so on. :-) Redcloth just ran into this I think. Hugh _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
