On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Chad Woolley wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Hugh Sasse<h...@dmu.ac.uk> wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Jun 2009, Chad Woolley wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Eric Hodel<drbr...@segment7.net> wrote:
> >> > We've been over this, and the answer is no.
> >> Why? I've described valid and useful reasons to do this. I don't
> >> remember your reasons against it, can you repeat them?
> > The archive is pointed to in the message headers, no time for me to
> > search for you now.
>
> You don't need to search the archives for me, I already did - my first
Sorry if that came across as criticism, I was trying to provide the
only help I could at the time. I'll leave the other points to Eric.
Hugh_______________________________________________
Rubygems-developers mailing list
http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems
Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
