On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Eric Hodel<drbr...@segment7.net> wrote: > On Jul 7, 2009, at 11:38, Christian Holtje wrote: >> >> I'm really enjoying ruby; the gem framework is absolutely amazing. >> >> When I was trying to use multiple versions of Ruby on the same system, I >> ran across this one confusing aspect: the executables for gems didn't have >> the same naming convention as the "ruby" and "irb" executables. >> >> So I filed bug 1728[1] and Eric Hodel was kind enough to point me to this >> mailing list. >> >> It seems that "gem --format-executable" should default to "true" because >> the binaries created have the name of the "ruby" executable embedded in >> them (in the #! at the top). > > I would like to make --format-executable the default for 1.4+. It seems > many more people are running multiple versions of ruby these days.
Hoo-rah! Strongly in favor. jeremy _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
