On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Eric Hodel <drbr...@segment7.net> wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2009, at 15:02, Eric Hodel wrote: > >> On Jun 14, 2009, at 20:30, Chad Woolley wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Chad Woolley<thewoolley...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Any reason we can't put the version back in >>>> rubygems/rubygems_version.rb? >>>> >>> >>> Assuming not, I fixed this too... >>> >> >> The streamlined Rakefile doesn't need this extra file. >> > > I reverted this change. I don't see why RubyGems needs to require an extra > file. If you need to extract a version without require 'rubygems' you can > use standard tools like grep. > Here's one reason why it needs this file: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=26740&group_id=126&atid=575 _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
