On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Luis Lavena <luislav...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Eric Hodel<drbr...@segment7.net> wrote: > > It's not a valid bug. RubyGems required this file as an implementation > > detail. If you're requiring this file you're doing it wrong. > To be clear, I had already fixed my code. This was merely reporting a bug in the rubygems update --system command. Yes, I was doing it wrong (lazily putting the require in app rather than test code), and I originally identified an incorrect solution (putting the file back), but this *discussion* has resulted in a correct low-priority ticket, assigned to me, to track the specific issue (a bug is a bug): http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=26752&group_id=126&atid=575 For the record, even old setup.rb left files as left overs when > installed using ruby setup.rb install > > Removal of old scripts like gem_server required manual patching of the > setup.rb file. > OK. Now I understand. Fixable, but low-priority. Thanks... -- Chad _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
