Bugs item #26958, was opened at 2009-08-20 05:18 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=575&aid=26958&group_id=126
Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Simon Chiang (prosperity) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: Gem::Specification.hash can cause to_yaml RangeError Initial Comment: Array.hash for objects do not produce a Fixnum hash will blow up. Gem::Specification often produces a Bignum and this prevents an array of specifications from being converted to YAML. This issue (which is really a ruby issue) will be fixed in a future release but I thought you might like to know in case you wanted to patch RubyGems for versions prior to the fix. (see http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/1883) ========================== RubyGems Environment: - RUBYGEMS VERSION: 1.3.1 - RUBY VERSION: 1.8.6 (2008-08-11 patchlevel 287) [universal-darwin9.0] - INSTALLATION DIRECTORY: /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8 - RUBY EXECUTABLE: /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/1.8/usr/bin/ruby - EXECUTABLE DIRECTORY: /usr/bin - RUBYGEMS PLATFORMS: - ruby - universal-darwin-9 - GEM PATHS: - /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8 - /Users/simonchiang/.gem/ruby/1.8 - /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/1.8/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8 - GEM CONFIGURATION: - :update_sources => true - :verbose => true - :benchmark => false - :backtrace => false - :bulk_threshold => 1000 - :sources => ["http://gems.rubyforge.org/";, "http://gems.github.com";] - REMOTE SOURCES: - http://gems.rubyforge.org/ - http://gems.github.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Simon Chiang (prosperity) Date: 2009-08-20 22:25 Message: @chad Ok, great. I'll work a little something up when I get a free minute. @eric A framework I'm working on (http://tap.rubyforge.org) discovers resources within gems and my environment ends up referencing an array of specs. At some point I dumped the environment and found the error. Honestly, it's just something I stumbled on. I don't actually have a specific need to convert the specs to YAML. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eric Hodel (drbrain) Date: 2009-08-20 20:48 Message: Why are you converting specs to YAML in the first place? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Chad Woolley (thewoolleyman) Date: 2009-08-20 17:55 Message: This looks reasonable and is reproducible, but I'm not sure what is dependent upon the current implementation of hash. Maybe someone else can weigh in... Regardless, can you please submit this as a proper patch, with your failing tests added to the appropriate file (test_gem_specification.rb) - and, of course, ensure nothing else in the test suite breaks? Thanks, -- Chad ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=575&aid=26958&group_id=126 _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
