On Aug 21, 2009, at 11:25 , Ryan Davis wrote:
On Aug 21, 2009, at 06:34 , Jim Weirich wrote:
Comments. Is this intended, or something that slipped through the
cracks.
not intended. I've discussed this aspect of plugins with eric
before. we'll look at it after lunch.
Apparently I was wrong and the behavior is intended. I think it is
wrong (but in this case I also think this is a case of bad code as
well). I think that gem plugin activation should be explicit.
_______________________________________________
Rubygems-developers mailing list
http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems
Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
