Hello guys, In case you didn't see the pull request #2:
http://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/pull/2 I wanted to bring it to attention. Basically the problem is raised due big gems, particularly QtBindings which Windows binaries weight 49MB and the pure-ruby one is 1.6MB The problem with such gems is evident: there is no 'clue' on what is going on. Over the pull request I mentioned that adding ProgressBar class is not ideal: 1) makes RubyGems depend on another piece of code 2) It clashes with another definition of ProgressBar I suggested do a clean and simple implementation as Rubinius guys did for the downloader. Is there any other point of concerns I should think off? Any UI that will be broken by this? Also, any recommendation to properly fake this out? This affects mostly binary gems or jruby ones that bundle big .jar files in it. Thank you for your time and looking forward your comments. -- Luis Lavena AREA 17 - Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but rather when there is nothing more to take away. Antoine de Saint-Exupéry _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers