On 17 Oct 2010, at 18:08, Luis Lavena wrote: > Hey guys, > > Going to top post on this because: > > - The original thread is going way to far from my original question. > - The trend seems to be defensive/aggressive > - It is turning into OT the whole CI/regression conversation. > > I thought my original question was simple, but going to rephrase it > since seems is not: > > Is anyone leading this thing? And if so, in the case of Eric, when > RubyGems will be in his attention-field? > > Asking this because last time I missed his attention field and 0.9.5 > got released turning the following weeks of that a nightmare of > support for Ruby on Windows (ala: me). It happen again in one of 1.2.x > releases. I don't want to reach strike 3. > > As Eric, I want to schedule my time properly, and for that I need to > know what is going on and where are we headed to. > > You can bring your whole CI/regression conversation in a new thread if > you want, but I have 12 open source project and juggling time for them > is turning a bit complicated.
As it happens, not currently having the ability to test on win32 is the exact reason I personally haven't merged the progressbars patches. That and scripted installs, there's a few other platform / use case oddities that need to be checked out. I want to get to it, but I'm not rushing as it's the kind of thing that doesn't work properly on non/bad ttys. As far as making testing on win32 easier is concerned, that'd help, but I'm not sure if anyones willing to fork out for a win32 CI box. I actually do have space on a server I have knocking around, but in my case, time and simple remote access are the annoying factors. _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
