On Dec 23, 2010, at 01:08 , Trans wrote: > I know of at least two gems it will break, and I suspect they are not > your four.
By not telling us what they are, you're being immature and asinine... and a troll. *sigh* You can just never stop trolling... > I thought RubyGems was supposed to be so *conservative* about changes, > and here a change is just going to be pushed that breaks people's > plugins for the sake of a speed up for those who have 500+ gems > installed? Apparently you're confusing us breaking 2-4 gems in a way that is easily documentable with your breaking every gemspec ever published. This is the conservative change. Do the math. I ... nevermind. I just deleted 3 paragraphs... I'm not going to justify our actions any further with a troll. _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
