> > But how do we get ruby-core to release 1.9.2 w/ our change? I've been > > asking for weeks and heard nothing to approve of or deny such a release. > > Suggestions? > > Just read your and Yusuke's latest...a few comments: > > 1) Show time ./ruby -ve '' on ruby 1.9.2p136 (2010-12-25 revision 30363) in > addition to trunk...hopefully these numbers will be larger than his ruby > 1.9.3dev (2011-01-14 trunk 30544) [i686-linux] results showing the patches > incrementally improve startup performance as well.
red herring :( # running on VirtualBox 4.0.0 on Win7 Ultimate 32-bit... $ uname -a Linux archee 2.6.36-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Jan 8 13:16:43 UTC 2011 i686 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T9300 @ 2.50GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux $ gem list | wc -l 34 $ time ./ruby -ve '' ruby 1.9.2p136 (2010-12-25 revision 30363) [i686-Linux] real 0m0.047s user 0m0.013s sys 0m0.030s $ time ./ruby -ve '' ruby 1.9.3dev (2011-01-14 trunk 30545) [i686-Linux] real 0m0.175s user 0m0.133s sys 0m0.043s $ time ./ruby --disable-gems -ve '' ruby 1.9.3dev (2011-01-14 trunk 30545) [i686-Linux] real 0m0.048s user 0m0.010s sys 0m0.040s Jon --- blog: http://jonforums.github.com/ _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers