> > But how do we get ruby-core to release 1.9.2 w/ our change? I've been 
> > asking for weeks and heard nothing to approve of or deny such a release. 
> > Suggestions?
> 
> Just read your and Yusuke's latest...a few comments:
> 
> 1) Show time ./ruby -ve '' on ruby 1.9.2p136 (2010-12-25 revision 30363) in 
> addition to trunk...hopefully these numbers will be larger than his ruby 
> 1.9.3dev (2011-01-14 trunk 30544) [i686-linux] results showing the patches 
> incrementally improve startup performance as well.

red herring :(

# running on VirtualBox 4.0.0 on Win7 Ultimate 32-bit...

$ uname -a
Linux archee 2.6.36-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Jan 8 13:16:43 UTC 2011 i686 
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T9300 @ 2.50GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux

$ gem list | wc -l
34

$ time ./ruby -ve ''
ruby 1.9.2p136 (2010-12-25 revision 30363) [i686-Linux]

real    0m0.047s
user    0m0.013s
sys     0m0.030s


$ time ./ruby -ve ''
ruby 1.9.3dev (2011-01-14 trunk 30545) [i686-Linux]

real    0m0.175s
user    0m0.133s
sys     0m0.043s


$ time ./ruby --disable-gems -ve ''
ruby 1.9.3dev (2011-01-14 trunk 30545) [i686-Linux]

real    0m0.048s
user    0m0.010s
sys     0m0.040s


Jon

---
blog: http://jonforums.github.com/
_______________________________________________
Rubygems-developers mailing list
http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems
Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers

Reply via email to