On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Chad Woolley <thewoolley...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Ryan Davis <ryand-r...@zenspider.com> wrote:
>> Not yet. I'm not willing to have it pointing at the list until it is more 
>> trustworthy.
>
> Please elaborate on what you think is untrustworthy.  As well as
> perhaps some make some effort to answer my detailed requests for
> feedback which you have thusfar ignored.
>
> Hugs,
> -- Chad

If you ignore this too, I'm going to start sending notifications to
the list again.

I've responded to everything promptly, and indicated where I'm
deferring things that I don't have time for right now.

AFAIK it is stable, running all the requested interpreters, and I've
gone to extra effort to make it easy for any committer to turn off
emails for selected builds if they go awry, as well as selectively
opt-in to them.

The committers on this project asked for CI, and I have provided it.
I don't have the time nor inclination to play whatever power trip
games you are playing with your selective communication.  It is
immature, disrespectful, and uncalled for.

Thanks,
-- Chad
_______________________________________________
Rubygems-developers mailing list
http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems
Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers

Reply via email to