All sounds great to me :)

- Charlie (mobile)

On Apr 25, 2011, at 18:49, Erik Hollensbe <e...@hollensbe.org> wrote:

> (Sorry for the top post)
> 
> This sounds about like what I found; I'll be happy to correct these in 
> rubygems proper, or at least remove them from testing under RUBY_PLATFORM =~ 
> /java/.
> 
> I definitely want to see what the fetcher issues are independently, they also 
> fail in rubinius which makes me suspect some assumption that exists in MRI 
> that isn't available elsewhere.
> 
> Does anyone object to this?
> 
> -Erik
> 
> On Apr 25, 2011, at 3:50 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
>> <head...@headius.com> wrote:
>>> I'd love to see JRuby have a regular CI test run against RubyGems. I
>>> believe we've managed in the past to have it almost 100% green, with
>>> just a few obscure failures. It definitely requires having
>>> jruby-openssl installed, as you'd expect, but I think a couple of us
>>> have spent time on the tests in the past.
>> 
>> Here's a run on my system with RubyGems 1.7.1 tag and JRuby master
>> (mostly 1.6.1ish).
>> 
>> https://gist.github.com/941050
>> 
>> Eleven F/E total for me...
>> 
>> * Three seem to be SSL key issues.
>> 
>> * Four look like this, and while I remember investigating before I
>> obviously didn't find the problem:
>> 
>> 3) Error:
>> test_install_domain_both_no_network(TestGemDependencyInstaller):
>> Gem::RemoteFetcher::FetchError: no data for
>> http://gems.example.com/gems/a-1.gem
>> (http://gems.example.com/gems/a-1.gem)
>> 
>> * A few were checking the output of building an extension. JRuby warns
>> when building extensions since that support is mostly experimental, so
>> it didn't match without manual patching locally. The test should be
>> fixed (see gist history to see it with the original errors in place).
>> 
>> * A couple more appear to be subtle differences in the errors we
>> report for some error conditions.
>> 
>> The pkey failures are probably the biggest concern, but overall the
>> suite is pretty close to green.
>> 
>> - Charlie
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rubygems-developers mailing list
>> http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems
>> Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rubygems-developers mailing list
> http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems
> Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
_______________________________________________
Rubygems-developers mailing list
http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems
Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers

Reply via email to