On May 13, 2011, at 07:55 , Stephen Bannasch wrote:
> How are people using GEM_HOME, in what situations and when (if ever) should
> it be ignored.
One additional note:
I think this problem will only get worse over time and I don't have a good
solution. In particular, I think GEM_HOME should die and we should only use
GEM_PATH (where we only write into the first entry). I think that GEM_PATH
should implicitly tack on something like isolate's multiruby suffix:
suffix = "#{Gem.ruby_engine}-#{RbConfig::CONFIG['ruby_version']}"
tho, it may be better to do something like 1.9's compatibility version instead.
_______________________________________________
Rubygems-developers mailing list
http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
