Yeah, I think you're right, it is quite a bit faster now.

-Erik

On Oct 17, 2011, at 7:16 AM, Nick Quaranto wrote:

> I wonder if it's just Heroku spinning up (it's only one dyno right
> now)...does it seem ok on subsequent loads? It's basically just a static
> site.
> 
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Erik Hollensbe <e...@hollensbe.org> wrote:
> 
>> Looks nice dude! The site seems a little slow atm though, figured I should
>> say something.
>> 
>> -Erik
>> 
>> On Oct 16, 2011, at 4:57 PM, Nick Quaranto wrote:
>> 
>>> Here's my first draft!
>>> 
>>> http://contribute.rubygems.org/
>>> 
>>> http://github.com/rubygems/contribute
>>> 
>>> Maybe eventually we can hook up github issues/api integration, but for
>> now
>>> it will do!
>>> 
>>> Any feedback/thoughts would be really appreciated.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RubyGems-Developers mailing list
>>> http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems
>>> RubyGems-Developers@rubyforge.org
>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> RubyGems-Developers mailing list
>> http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems
>> RubyGems-Developers@rubyforge.org
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> RubyGems-Developers mailing list
> http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems
> RubyGems-Developers@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers

_______________________________________________
RubyGems-Developers mailing list
http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems
RubyGems-Developers@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers

Reply via email to