I was just browsing through the ActiveResource code and I wonder why
the use of .xml throughout on the URLs? Wouldn't it make more sense to
just have ActiveResource set the content type to application/xml and
then use paths without the extensions?

Sincerely,
Anthony Eden

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to