if my opinion count and this package has been well tested, I'd say "Add please".
although if it only patches ruby, not rails, it could be a separate gems or a patch on ruby core/stdlib
Mathieu
On 9/23/06, Peter Michaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/23/06, Manfred Stienstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 23, 2006, at 8:08 AM, Michael Koziarski wrote:
>
> > I'm definitely keen to see this get added. However I'm a bit
> > concerned about the lack of discussion in this thread. It's a big
> > piece of work, and I was hoping more people would have opinions on it
>
> I think that's the problem, because the codebase is pretty esotheric
> not much people want to dive in and give their opinion. I could
> explain on a global level, without gettting into all the details
> concerning encoding, what it does and what decisions were made during
> coding if anyone is interested.
I'm interested in a general overview on what problem it fixes and why
it is needed. I don't know much about the whole unicode problem with
Ruby people keep bringing up and then other say it isn't really a
problem.
Peter
--
gcc -O0 -DRUBY_EXPORT -rdynamic -Wl,-export-dynamic -L. main.o -lruby-static -ldl -lcrypt -lm -o ruby
Everyone is trying their hardest to do their job but management has set it up so that it's impossible.
Take the control over your money, track your expenses http://justbudget.com
Mathieu
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
