I'll take a look at the patch, but I'm a bit dubious at the start --
this quickly becomes a rabbit hole, as you start to get into
user-defined functions, etc. It may just be that skipping functional
indexes in the dump is the safest bet, and allow folks to support them
manually.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
We're using Rails on an Oracle database. If we define an index like the
following, we end up with problems during the "db:schema:dump" rake target.
add_index "emcolumn", ["upper(name)"], :name => "ind_emcolumn_uname"
The created schema.rb file contains:
add_index "emcolumn", ["sys_nc00013$"], :name => "ind_emcolumn_uname"
Well, we are aware we can use "config.active_record.schema_format =
:sql" to fall back to a SQL file containing only table definition
statements. However it would be nice if the Oracle adapter would
understand such constructs. A possible solution for this problem is
attached as patch against Rails 1.2 RC1.
I'm quite sure it's not perfect yet. Maybe someone can pick up the idea
and improve it to make it ready to go into the official sources.
Best Regards,
Andreas Gungl
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on
Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---