Mislav, First off, thanks for cleaning up after me. My Ruby wasn't strong enough to quickly figure out how to do that (which is what I would have said was the right thing to do).
Second, perhaps another thread, aren't the tests part of the codebase ? Alan On Feb 23, 5:00 pm, "Mislav Marohnić" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/23/07, Chad Fowler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > What you're saying is "simple" but incorrect. > > > I doubt anyone on the Rails core team would agree that broken tests > > aren't real defects or that fixing them isn't a high priority. > > When I said "real defects" I meant defects in the codebase (I thought one > could tell from the context). Tests can have defects, of course, as well as > any other code. I've submitted a proper patch to tackle this specific > issue:http://dev.rubyonrails.org/attachment/ticket/7614/hash-comparison.diff > > It modifies the test so that the hash string is extracted from the error > message, broken into parts, sorted and compared. The actual error messages > are compared without hashes in them. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
