Hi Zach, On Feb 26, 2007, at 3:15 PM, zdennis wrote: >> I like Ernie's suggestion of a SqlStatement-like object, or even >> better, >> settling on some duck-typing conventions for sql-like strings. >> >> SqlString < String could also hold its bind variables. The >> database adapter >> could translate that to whatever native support for bound >> parameters, even >> prepare and cache the statement. > > This sounds like a good idea. Can you guys expand on this more for how > it'd handle queries in practice?
I pulled together my efforts from last year into a blog post: http://www.opendarwin.org/~drernie/C499496031/E20070226153152/index.html Not very complete, but hopefully it gives you a flavor of what I was attempting -- and how much I had to patch ActiveRecord to get the behavior I wanted. Best, -- Ernie P. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
