Excellent point. Perhaps this should be kept in the current core and be pulled for 2.0 which the next book (?) will address.
~Wayne On Mar 02, 2007, at 13:47 , Justin Forder wrote: > Josh Peek wrote: >> I want to raise some discussion on whether dynamic scaffolding should >> be deprecated or not? >> >> I don't think it has any real production value. I've seen examples of >> improving dynamic scaffolding to work better with resources, but I >> don't think they belong in core. If anything, dynamic scaffolding >> would serve better as a plugin. >> >> Anyone agree? > > I see that lots of people are agreeing, but please bear in mind > that the > second edition of AWDR starts work on the Depot application by using > dynamic scaffolding. The first edition did not. > > Deprecating dynamic scaffolding will give the impression to AWDR2 > readers, just when they are starting to work with Rails against a > database, that Rails is not stable. > > regards > > Justin Forder --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
