On 5/21/07, Pelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I want to go in and improve the default scaffold (ex > resource_scaffold) a bit and noticed the lack of tests for generators. > > So I thought I'd give people a heads up that I'm working on creating > initially tests for the scaffold generator as well as test helpers to > make it simpler to test generators in the future. I'll probably go > through and create tests for the built in generators as well > eventually.
Sounds great, Pelle. > I have a question about layout. I'm currently placing the scaffold > tests in: > > railties/test/rails_scaffold_generator_test.rb > > Does that make sense naming wise? So afterwards there could be: > > railties/test/rails_model_generator_test.rb > etc. > > I've also created the test helpers in > > railties/test/generator_test_helpers.rb > > Does that follow convension or should I rather put them somewhere > else, to make it easier for say plugin developers to use them? how about a test subdirectory, like railties/test/generators/* > Finally as part of my testing I build up a very basic rails directory > structure under railties/test/fixtures/tmp and then delete it again in > the teardown. I have seen similar things done in the tests from > various plugins and it works, can anyone see any issues with that? Nope. All good. jeremy --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
