That sounds like a reasonable option. Perhaps something else worth considering is that overriding the root element for a given model class is a little hard. Perhaps that's a sign we should be refactoring the serialization a little?
On 5/24/07, ara.t.howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On May 23, 2007, at 5:57 PM, Michael Koziarski wrote: > > > > >> http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8305 > >> http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8308 > > > > An XML namespace has to be declared to be valid xml, so the patches > > submitted seem to leave us in the same situation where .to_xml will > > produce invalid xml. > > > > So given Module::Model, the only options I can think of are > > <module_model> or <model>? Which is better or worse for your > > particular situation? > > > > what about '<module-model>' since '-' cannot possible be part of a > ruby class/module name? it allows for > > <module-foo_bar> > etc. > > -a > -- > we can deny everything, except that we have the possibility of being > better. simply reflect on that. > h.h. the 14th dalai lama > > > > > > > -- Cheers Koz --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
