On 6/15/07, Mislav Marohnić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/15/07, John W. Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I've written an article suggesting some radical changes to the Rails > > directory structure for Rails 2.0 and am curious to know the core > > team's thoughts about it: > > Nice article, short and to the point. > > While the benefits are certainly recognizable, I, for one, would find > slightly shocking to have a directory like this: > blog/ > _config.rb > _routes.rb > blog_controller.rb > blog_helper.rb > > blog_index.rhtml > blog_archive.rhtml > blog_post.rhtml > comment.rb > comment_migrations.rb > comments_controller.rb > comments_helper.rb > comments_view.rhtml > post.rb > > post_migrations.rb > > I've been spoiled by the clean separation in Rails and I'd hate to go back > to spaghetti directory structure. I imagine that most of its users would > feel the same, too.
Some of my larger plugins tend to look like that, though. It feels wrong, I want to add directories to separate models and controllers. Though ultimately, textmate makes it so I don't have to care that much about the actual directory structure. -- Rick Olson http://lighthouseapp.com http://weblog.techno-weenie.net http://mephistoblog.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
