Requiring peer review is great. Also, multiple peer review can help mitigate the tyranny of the zealous :)
I don't personally have time to make core patches any more but would be happy to help the community in this way by moderating. Great ideas! ------- Courtenay http://blog.caboo.se On Jul 13, 2007, at 8:32 PM, "Michael Koziarski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey guys, > > In the interest of streamlining the patch-submission process, we've > been thinking about writing down the informal vetting process we've > been using for patches. The first cut of this is written down in the > wiki: > > http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails/pages/PatchRequirements > > Any comments or questions? > > -- > Cheers > > Koz > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
