Did anything ever come of this? Cheers, Obie
On 5/23/07, Duane Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For your consideration, two snippets from a routes.rb file: > > map.namespace(:bookshelf, :path_prefix => "/bookshelf/:book_id") do > |bookshelf| > bookshelf.resources :sections > bookshelf.resources :templates > end > > map.namespace(:bookshelf) do |bookshelf| > bookshelf.publish ":book_id/publish", :controller => "publish" > bookshelf.physical_pages ":book_id/physical_pages", :controller => > "physical_pages" > end > > Both of these "namespace" blocks create routes to paths such as: > "/bookshelf/1/sections" > "/bookshelf/1/publish" > > I was unable to use :path_prefix in the second map.namespace case, as it > would then (apparently) try to route the ":controller" segment to > "bookshelf/:book_id/publish". Obviously, no such controller exists. > > It seems to me that the "resources" method is smart enough to use the > path_prefix for constructing the path only, while the regular named routes > try to prepend the path_prefix directly to the name of the controller. > > It would be nice to remove the redundancy and combine these two > map.namespace blocks in to one. Am I missing something, or can anyone > confirm this assessment? > > -- > Duane Johnson > (canadaduane) > > > -- Obie Fernandez http://jroller.com/obie/ Pre-order my book The Rails Way today! http://www.amazon.com/dp/0321445619 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
