On 9/19/07, Pascal Belloncle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I like the approach, a lot. But (isn't there always a but...), isn't > this going to be a problem for people using shared hosting, or people > that just can't install gems? Unless there is an easy way to locally > install gems... >
On any decent shared host you can install your own gems. If you can't then you will be in for a world of hurt anyway, and frankly, the world of shared Rails hosting is too low of a common denominator too target. There are too many issues with memory and stability as it is, so I say we make Rails do the best thing it can assuming a VPS or dedicated box, and then let the shared hosts figure out how to make it work for $5/month. Putting Rails' weight behind the gem system seems like a win-win to me. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
