IMO if we're going to have an IrreversibleMigration exception, we
should allow one to omit the down method. Sorry for not specifying :)

On 9/22/07, Lance Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So then what is the point of the IrreversibleMigration exception? If
> you are going to force people to create a rollback then that exception
> should not exist.
>
> On 9/22/07, DHH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Posted here as it's a somewhat opinionated patch.
> >
> > This doesn't match my usage pattern. Usually my migrations that just
> > go up are about fixing data or something else, like populating a
> > counter cache. I still want to be able to go 3 versions back, but if
> > there's an irreversible mixed in there it'll halt.
> >
> >
> > > >
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to