On Oct 1, 2:14 pm, "Piyush Ranjan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a thought : I do not use sessions in most of my critical applications
> which need to serve more than 10K req/sec (a magic no. I have zeroed upon).
> I rely on a completely cookie based authentication system which AFAIK is
> quiet safe(a lot of central auth system use such an approach), it gives me a
> major performance
> boosthttp://pranjan.blogspot.com/2007/07/wanna-make-your-rails-app-faster....
> Although I do need to hack a few things to show flash and/or error messages
> as sessions are switched off but I feel it is worth it.
that's very interesting indeed. i'm just about do confirm that the
normal file based sessions do not leak and also test stephan kaas'
alternate db backed sessions. if both do not leak i can narrow my
search to rails' activerecord store. if either do i'll be 99% sure
the leak is in ruby and probably have to resort to dmalloc and co.
uggh.
your suggestion, however, is a very good one and could be quite
suitable for our application. thanks a bunch.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
