rescue_from stores exception class names in a hash table, and associates them with handlers.
When an exception is raised there's a name lookup, and if an entry is found its handler is invoked. In particular rescue_from does not emulate Ruby's rescue semantics with regard to inheritance. Which is the rationale? Don't you think taking is_a? and declaration order into account would provide a better (expected) usage? I could write a patch in that case. -- fxn PS: A friend of mine and Google Groups didn't receive this email, please excuse me if you get it more than once. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
