On Jan 16, 2008 12:41 PM, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/16/08, ara.t.howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Jan 16, 2008, at 8:33 AM, Pratik wrote: > > > > > > > > Btw, I like the idea of renaming it to Application instead of > > > ApplicationController, in case we *must* change it. > > > > > > > Application::Controller > > Application::Model > > Application::View > > Applcation::Config > > I kind of like this idea, although my gut instinct tells me that it > might want to follow the existing module hierarchy. > > class Application::ActionController < ::ActionController::Base > class Application::ActiveRecord::Base < ::ActiveRecord::Base > class Application::ActionView::Base < ::ActionView::Base > > I'm not sure what Config is, TMail::Config? > > -- > Rick DeNatale > > My blog on Ruby
All these things smell like premature generalization to me... - Rob http://robsanheim.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
