OK, so we're keeping formatted_foo helpers for now. But what of my patch? http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10883
It fixes issues. It adds tons of documentation. It provides more test coverage. Is there anything wrong with it? Anything that someone would like to put up for discussion, or to have me change it? Thanks. - Mislav On Jan 25, 2008 3:31 AM, Michael Koziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've often wondered why (apart from specific implementation reasons) we > need > > a formatted_xxx helper to cater for formats at all. > > I don't believe there's a reason beyond the (considerable) > implementation specific reasons :). Changing that with the current > routing implementation would probably be a little tricky without > making everyone generate urls like: > > /albums/1.html > > > I think it's because formatted_ seems to just add noise to the method > name. > > The format isn't (to me) the most important thing, it's more of an > > afterthought. Keeping it's specification exclusively in the params > mirrors > > that imho. > > While it's a little odd, I don't see an easy migration path that's > suitable for a point release. > > -- > Cheers > > Koz > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
