On Feb 9, 2008 7:35 PM, Glenn Rempe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In other words, no > method signature is easily available since these are method_missing > dynamic methods. How can we improve this?
With better documentation on the class level. I don't think there is any other way (except for hacking RDoc maybe with a custom feature, good luck with that). I strongly oppose your suggestion #2; it's unintuitive and hard to implement (e.g. what if the user has a "conditions" attribute). About #3: better documentation is definitely a way to go. As you were surprised yourself and thinking others may be, write a doc patch to stress out how conditions are not working -- the name of the finder is a condition itself. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
