Well I managed to find the google group for the sqlserver adapter so I will post there too.
http://groups.google.com/group/rails-sqlserver-adapter/ Adam On Apr 16, 6:44 pm, "Chad Woolley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Adam Meehan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Any chance we can have the old gems back? > > Yes, we notice you deleted Rails 1.99.0, too. Were these deleted on > purpose or accidentally? If on purpose, why? Projects that don't > want to freeze Rails may still reference them (we are waiting on a > release with a fixed Test::Unit), or might be dormant with an > (unfrozen) reference to a beta gem version. Space can't be an issue, > so I can't see why publicly published artifacts (that could have even > been referenced in Rails blog posts) should go away. You could even > stick them on rubyforge if you don't want to maintain them, if a > higher version is already out it should not matter. Yes, we can (and > do) run our own gem server, but not everyone does. > > -- Chad --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
