Yep! Working now!

On Jun 5, 5:33 am, Joshua Peek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Its a step backwards in removing all this CGI junk but its going have
> to do until we don't have to support it.
>
> http://github.com/rails/rails/commit/c4d570c2eb6b7bd0a529e20a10557541...
>
> On Jun 3, 9:56 am, José Valim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Yep, I thought so!
> > I was saying for precaution! ;)
>
> > So until now, sessions work but not cookies.
>
> > On Jun 3, 4:07 pm, Joshua Peek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 3, 5:08 am, José Valim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Hmmmmm, cookies problem still not solved.
>
> > > > Now they are set, but for a strange reason, I can't read them. In the
> > > > middle of an action, I get:
>
> > > > p cookies.inspect
> > > > => {"_session_id"=>"BAh7BzoMY3NyZl9pZCIlMjQ0MzM2MzYyODkzOWJj...",
> > > > "lang"=>"en"}
>
> > > > p cookies["_session_id"]
> > > > => nil
>
> > > > p cookies["lang"]
> > > > => nil
>
> > > > p cookies.keys
> > > > => {"_session_id", "lang"}
>
> > > > p cookies.values
> > > > => {"BAh7BzoMY3NyZl9pZCIlMjQ0MzM2MzYyODkzOWJj...", "en"}
>
> > > > p cookies[cookies.keys.first]
> > > > => nil
>
> > > That fix was for sessions. I didn't really test cookies yet.
>
> > > > And I've noticed a couple more things:
>
> > > > 1. I wasn't able to start thin with it:
>
> > > > rackup -p 3000 -s thin
>
> > > > Unless I put in my environment (or a require somewhere):
>
> > > > config.gem 'thin'
>
> > > > Are you planning to handle those things by default? =)
>
> > > There is no way know that thin is an adapter without requiring the
> > > gem. Thin and Ebb are the only two I can think of that manage their
> > > own handlers inside their gems. If you would like to see this
> > > automatic, ask the thin guys to send their handler over to the rack.
> > > BTW, this isn't a problem just with Rails, but every rack app with
> > > rackup and thin.
>
> > > rackup -p 3000 -r thin -s thin or require it in your config
>
> > > > 2. Mongrel starts really slowly and without messages. On the other
> > > > hand, Webrick and Thin (after the first step) work like a charm! =)
>
> > > haha, not sure. I wish rackup would print out some more informative
> > > text.
>
> > > I did not write rackup and it is not what you will likely be using one
> > > rails is all switched over. Rackup is a universal command for all rack
> > > apps. We will tailor our script/server to be a bit more friendly.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to