On 22 Jun 2008, at 14:39, Herval wrote:
> > In our project, we had to assign a variable name to > periodically_call_remote, so that we could manipulate it using rjs/ > javascript (for instance, calling stop()). The details are on this > ticket: http://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994-ruby-on-rails/tickets/468 > is it worth allowing a little more flexibility? Eg I might want to store the executor as a property of some other object. A flexible way round this would be if you could supply a function and we'd call it passing the brand new periodical executor. Can't decide whether I think this would be overkill. Fred > cheers, > Herval > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
