Whether you're on git, svn, cvs, copying files to one-another, numeric migrations are a show-stopper.
To revert the question, why do you want numeric migrations that bad? On 11 Jul 2008, at 16:29, Andrew Stone wrote: > > Every application that gets coded by more then one person has benefit > with timestamped migrations. I think most Rails applications get > developed by > 1 person, so timestamped migrations are the logical > choice imo. > > > Thanks for the input Jan. I'm not saying timestamps don't have > benefits, I just disagree with the way they were introduced and the > fact they were made mandatory. Git has benefits for a team > environment, but not everyone is forced to use it, it's an option. > > -- > Andrew Stone > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
