You say it like "we just need volunteers." I've worked feverishly to little result to wrangle people into writing Rails documentation.
If you know of a mythical large group of people who want to write docs, then please whip them into a documentation fury and unleash them upon Rails. --Jeremy On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:44 PM, David Dollar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jul 16, 2008, at 7:44 PM, Ryan Bigg wrote: > >> At least 90% of the time I go to this site to see some information or >> to link somebody to one of the pages, it's down. The page quality on >> some of the pages isn't exactly up to "wiki standards" either and is >> sometimes out of date. > > I completely agree. When I was just getting started with rails it often > suprised and irritated me that the quality of this wiki seemed to be so > poor. > >> What is the cause for this downtime and what can be done to fix it? >> I'd like to extend lifo's idea of improving Rails documentation to >> improving the wiki documentation since this is what most new-comers >> would be experiencing, a Ruby on Rails site that has more downtime >> than Twitter on a "good" week. > > It also seems like the 'default' docs site hasn't been updated in > forever and a day. What is the issue, do we just need some volunteers? -- http://jeremymcanally.com/ http://entp.com/ http://omgbloglol.com My books: http://manning.com/mcanally/ http://humblelittlerubybook.com/ (FREE!) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
