On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 3:04 AM, Mislav Marohnić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This issue was raised > before: > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core/browse_thread/thread/bd1ea7763627ed0d > Are your questions answered in that thread? Hey thank you Mislav I missed that thread. It is not clear to me that the rationale is explained there, but at least I see there are people that have a notion of "optional dependency" in which this behaviour might make sense for them. I am for sure +1 on failing hard and handling your occasional optional library with Ruby code anyway. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
