On 25 Sep 2008, at 04:14, David Stevenson wrote:
> > Koz et al, > > I'm trying to write a patch for this ticket: > > http://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/1104-references_eager_loaded_tables-should-search-tables-in-join-clauses > > I want to make rails better at guessing which style of :include to > execute (pre-2.1 vs 2.1+), but I don't see any tests like what I'm > trying to test in eager_test.rb > > So how would I test that rails is doing the :include one way vs > another? Both would work and produce identical results at the end, so > it seems not possible to functionally test this. Yet all these tests > check the function of finders, rather than unit testing the individual > support methods (I could obviously test this by unit testing > references_eager_loaded_tables? method). Normally here, I'd use > expectations to see that things are working under the hood the right > way... > Neat - I've been hitting that recently. Bit of a kludge but could you just look at the number of queries made (ie 1 for join based monster, number of associations + 1 in other cases) ? Fred --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
