On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Will Bryant <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Michael Koziarski <[email protected]> > wrote: >> I'm pretty much in favour of #1 for 2-3-stable and investigating 2 or >> 3 for master. Barring any objections I'll revert it today and we can >> keep tinkering in master. Now my month of conference travel is almost >> over I'm pretty keen to focus on getting a point release out. > > Sounds good to me.
Done. I've also added the failing tests in the ticket to 2-3-stable so we should catch this if the change accidentally comes back. > If we're going to work on a new solution for master, this would be a > good time to consider suggestions like COUNT(DISTINCT > `tablename`.primary_key) to deal with joins etc. too. Sounds good to me. > > > -- Cheers Koz --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
