I'm oppose to this though. In my point of view, I think the name `match` is already appropriate for it, as it mean that the router will try 'match' the incoming request with each route, and sent the one that 'matched' to the appropriate controller.
Not core team I am, so let's see how other thinks :) -- Prem S. On 23 ก.พ. 2553, at 13:06, Jeff wrote: > Anybody have thoughts on this one? (Criticism is ok if I'm off my > rocker.) > > Jeff > > On Feb 20, 2:13 pm, Jeff <[email protected]> wrote: >> In Rails 3 routing, it seems we're using the match() method to hook up >> arbitrary url patterns to rack endpoints (which I think is a great new >> routing feature). >> >> I'd like to suggest that we name it "connect", instead of "match": >> >> 1. It maintains continuity with previous versions of rails >> 2. It's more descriptive of the intention of a route: to connect a >> requested url with an endpoint that can generate a response. >> >> Feedback? >> >> Thanks! >> Jeff > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
