With Jeremy McAnally's Upgrade PDF it's not that difficult to upgrade from Rails 2.3 to 3.0 anyway, so I'd question the value/effort of back-porting this (and creating another maintenance branch).
Cheers, Andy -- Andy Jeffries http://andyjeffries.co.uk/ #rubyonrails #mysql #jquery Registered address: 64 Sish Lane, Stevenage, Herts, SG1 3LS Company number: 5452840 On 26 February 2010 22:07, Jeff <[email protected]> wrote: > Could a new ActiveRecord/ActiveSupport pair be released independently > of Rails 3.0, for use with 2.x apps? Maybe make a Rails 2.4 release > that is 2.3.5 plus new ActiveRecord/ActiveSupport? > > This way 2.x apps could get the benefits of the new AR interface, and > in this way also migrate toward 3.0 in steps, if they’re not ready to > upgrade all the way to 3.0. > > Since all of the changes are isolated to ActiveRecord/ActiveSupport, > would this be possible? > > Jeff > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<rubyonrails-core%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
